PDF

Course guide and study route#

Topics of Statistical Learning studies the statistical structure behind learning with incomplete information and inference after a data-dependent choice. The course combines mathematical derivations, small computational investigations, critical reading, and a focused research project.

Course information#

Item

Proposed arrangement

Instructor

Chi-Kuang Yeh · cyeh@gsu.edu

Course number

STAT 8XXX — number to be assigned

Level and credits

Advanced master’s / doctoral elective; 3 proposed credit hours

Teaching format

Lecture, seminar discussion, and guided computational investigations

Duration

15 teaching weeks; also suitable for independent study

Preparation

Graduate probability and inference, linear algebra, basic optimisation, statistical learning, and programming experience

Independent preparation

Approximately 6–9 hours per week during a taught offering

Offering information

Term, CRN, room, meeting times, and office hours to be announced

The public book is usable immediately. Course registration, dated deadlines, and institutional policies are supplied separately when an offering is confirmed.

Learning outcomes#

  1. Specify the observed variables, latent variables, population target, and observation mechanism for a learning problem.

  2. Derive PU and UU risk representations and explain the assumptions behind identification and stable estimation.

  3. Distinguish noisy, complementary, partial, bag-level, and multiple-source labels, and recognise how their mechanisms differ.

  4. Analyse identification, separation, comparison design, and dependence in preference models.

  5. Formulate full-information and bandit problems, define an appropriate comparator, and derive a basic regret guarantee.

  6. Distinguish ordinary, selective, and simultaneous inferential claims, including claims made after clustering.

  7. Conduct and communicate a reproducible methodological investigation with a baseline, a sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty assessment.

A 15-week teaching route#

The chapters are learning units. The schedule allocates extra time to the assumptions and computations that benefit from discussion.

Wk

Question and material

Reading focus

Suggested milestone

1

Targets, risks, and observation mechanisms

The course’s model–target–mechanism framework

Computational readiness check

2

Forms of weak supervision

Natarajan et al.; optional Ishida and Ratner

Mechanism comparison

3

Positive–unlabelled learning

Elkan–Noto; PU risk derivation

Start Assignment 1

4

PU estimation and sensitivity

Kiryo et al.; selected Bekker sections

Prior and selection experiment

5

Two unlabelled mixtures

Lu et al.; inversion and conditioning

Assignment 1

6

Pairwise preferences

Turner–Firth; identification and estimation

Project proposal

7

Context and comparison design

Preference model extensions; optional DPO

Start Assignment 2

8

Online learning and regret

Selected Hazan sections

Work through the OGD bound

9

Bandit feedback

Selected Lattimore–Szepesvári chapters

Evaluate exploration

10

Duelling bandits

Yue et al.; winner criteria

Assignment 2

11

Selection and conditional inference

Lee et al.; truncated reference distributions

Reproduction checkpoint

12

Inference after hierarchical clustering

Gao–Bien–Witten

Start Assignment 3

13

Inference after k-means

Chen–Witten; optional data thinning

Audit algorithm choices

14

Research synthesis

Project-specific primary papers

Assignment 3; project clinic

15

Project presentations and discussion

Revisit the target and assumptions

Presentation; final report in the designated final period

Independent-study route#

Work through one chapter at a time. For each chapter, write down the model and target before reading the derivation. Run the supplied experiment unchanged, reproduce its main result, then alter one parameter or assumption. Answer at least one derivation question and one experimental question before revealing a solution. Keep a short record of what the experiment can and cannot establish.

For a narrower reading group, Chapters 1–5 form a weak-supervision block; Chapters 6–10 form a preference and sequential-learning block; Chapters 11–13 form an inference-after-selection block. Chapter 1 supplies notation for all routes, and Chapter 14 provides a shared project framework.

Proposed assessment for a taught offering#

Component

Weight

Timing

Three integrated assignments

45% total; 15% each

Weeks 5, 10, 14

Paper discussion and a two-page reading note

10%

Assigned during the term

Project proposal

5%

Week 6

Reproduction checkpoint

10%

Week 11

Final project report

20%

Designated final-assessment period

Project presentation

10%

Week 15

There is no proposed written midterm or final examination. A well-designed reproduction with one consequential extension is sufficient for the project. A new theorem or publication is not required. Details and rubrics are on the assignment and project pages.

Working principles#

Reproducibility. Record random seeds, software versions, preprocessing, data provenance, and an execution command. Separate training, method selection, and final evaluation. Report Monte Carlo uncertainty for simulated performance.

Collaboration. Discuss ideas and compare understanding. Identify collaborators and external sources, and write your own derivations, code, and interpretation. Any offering-specific collaboration policy takes precedence for assessed work.

AI tools. They may assist with coding, editing, or checking a line of reasoning when permitted by the offering. Record substantive use and verify the result. An apparently plausible derivation, citation, or executable program still needs independent checking. Do not put restricted or confidential data into an external service.

Accessibility and policies. Students should use the official accommodations and support channels at their institution. The final offering syllabus will include the applicable attendance, late-work, academic-integrity, accessibility, and support policies. This public study guide does not substitute for that document.